# Audiobookshelf vs drive

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Audiobookshelf | drive |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #19 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 14 839 ✓ | 481 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +402 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.37.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.25.3 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Audiobookshelf scores 79/100 against 49/100 for drive, so it is the safer default.

drive ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Audiobookshelf.

If you want the quickest setup, Audiobookshelf is easier to run; drive needs more configuration.

Audiobookshelf is growing faster right now (+402 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Audiobookshelf](https://selfhost.directory/project/audiobookshelf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/audiobookshelf.md)
- [drive](https://selfhost.directory/project/drive) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/drive.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/audiobookshelf-vs-drive