# Audiobookshelf vs Concat

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Audiobookshelf | Concat |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #1 of 18 in Video Processing |
| GitHub stars | 14 839 ✓ | 12 421 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +419 | +2 422 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v2.37.2 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Concat scores 82/100 against 79/100 for Audiobookshelf, so it is the safer default.

Audiobookshelf ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.

Concat is growing faster right now (+2 422 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Audiobookshelf](https://selfhost.directory/project/audiobookshelf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/audiobookshelf.md)
- [Concat](https://selfhost.directory/project/concat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/concat.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/audiobookshelf-vs-concat