Audiobookshelfvscabernet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Audiobookshelf | cabernet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #78 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 14 839 | 379 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +419 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 7 |
| Latest release | v2.37.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | 0.9.16.02 · 13 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Audiobookshelf scores 79/100 against 46/100 for cabernet, so it is the safer default.
Audiobookshelf ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for cabernet.
If you want the quickest setup, Audiobookshelf is easier to run; cabernet needs more configuration.
Audiobookshelf is growing faster right now (+419 stars in 30 days).
Audiobookshelf details →cabernet details →
Swap a project
Keep Audiobookshelf, compare it with
Keep cabernet, compare it with