# audio.cpp vs openclaw

> Two self-hosted [AI projects](https://selfhost.directory/ai), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | audio.cpp | openclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #23 of 125 in AI | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 3 832 | 393 278 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 930 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 37 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 66/100 for audio.cpp, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for audio.cpp.

If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; audio.cpp needs more configuration.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 930 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [audio.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/audio-cpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/audio-cpp.md)
- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/audio-cpp-vs-openclaw