# audio.cpp vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | audio.cpp | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #23 of 125 in AI | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 3 835 | 92 870 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +57 929 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 66/100 for audio.cpp, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for audio.cpp.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; audio.cpp needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 929 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [audio.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/audio-cpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/audio-cpp.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/audio-cpp-vs-omnivoice-studio