AttunevsObserval
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Attune | Observal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 11 in Package Management | #32 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 210 | 4 533 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 210 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 33 |
| Latest release | v0.2.2 · 26 Nov 2025 | v1.15.1 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Observal scores 67/100 against 43/100 for Attune, so it is the safer default.
Observal ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Attune.
If you want the quickest setup, Observal is easier to run; Attune needs more configuration.
Observal is growing faster right now (+1 210 stars in 30 days).
Attune details →Observal details →
Swap a project
Keep Attune, compare it with
Keep Observal, compare it with