# atomicmemory vs supermemory

> Two self-hosted [Mem0 alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/mem0), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | atomicmemory | supermemory |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #35 of 125 in AI | #19 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 440 | 31 447 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +599 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | cli-v0.4.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | server-v0.0.9 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supermemory scores 73/100 against 54/100 for atomicmemory, so it is the safer default.

supermemory ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for atomicmemory.

If you want the quickest setup, supermemory is easier to run; atomicmemory needs more configuration.

supermemory is growing faster right now (+599 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [atomicmemory](https://selfhost.directory/project/atomicmemory) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/atomicmemory.md)
- [supermemory](https://selfhost.directory/project/supermemory) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supermemory.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/atomicmemory-vs-supermemory