# atomicmemory vs memory-os

> Two self-hosted [Mem0 alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/mem0), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | atomicmemory | memory-os |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #35 of 125 in AI | #167 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 440 | 1 384 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +12 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | cli-v0.4.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

atomicmemory scores 54/100 against 40/100 for memory-os, so it is the safer default.

atomicmemory ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for memory-os.

memory-os is growing faster right now (+12 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [atomicmemory](https://selfhost.directory/project/atomicmemory) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/atomicmemory.md)
- [memory-os](https://selfhost.directory/project/memory-os) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/memory-os.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/atomicmemory-vs-memory-os