# atomicmemory vs graymatter

> Two self-hosted [Mem0 alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/mem0), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | atomicmemory | graymatter |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #35 of 125 in AI | #38 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 440 | 488 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | cli-v0.4.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | v0.20.1 · 9 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

atomicmemory scores 54/100 against 53/100 for graymatter, so it is the safer default.

graymatter ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for atomicmemory.

If you want the quickest setup, graymatter is easier to run; atomicmemory needs more configuration.

## Details

- [atomicmemory](https://selfhost.directory/project/atomicmemory) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/atomicmemory.md)
- [graymatter](https://selfhost.directory/project/graymatter) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/graymatter.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/atomicmemory-vs-graymatter