# Atomic Chat vs Qwen Gate

> Two self-hosted [OpenAI API alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/openai-api), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Atomic Chat | Qwen Gate |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 69 in AI Chat | #70 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 1 867 ✓ | 206 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.2.26 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.8.0 · 25 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Atomic Chat scores 60/100 against 46/100 for Qwen Gate, so it is the safer default.

Qwen Gate ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Atomic Chat.

If you want the quickest setup, Atomic Chat is easier to run; Qwen Gate needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Atomic Chat](https://selfhost.directory/project/atomic-chat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/atomic-chat.md)
- [Qwen Gate](https://selfhost.directory/project/qwengate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qwengate.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/atomic-chat-vs-qwengate