# AtoM vs spacedrive

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AtoM | spacedrive |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 70/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation | #4 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 304 | 39 333 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +311 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.7.3-hotfix.1 · 26 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

spacedrive scores 70/100 against 56/100 for AtoM, so it is the safer default.

AtoM ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for spacedrive.

If you want the quickest setup, spacedrive is easier to run; AtoM needs more configuration.

spacedrive is growing faster right now (+311 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AtoM](https://selfhost.directory/project/atom) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/atom.md)
- [spacedrive](https://selfhost.directory/project/spacedrive) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/spacedrive.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/atom-vs-spacedrive