# Astroluma vs budibase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Astroluma | budibase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 74/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #18 of 44 in Dashboard | #2 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 772 | 28 367 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +67 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 75 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

budibase scores 74/100 against 49/100 for Astroluma, so it is the safer default.

budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Astroluma.

budibase is growing faster right now (+67 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Astroluma](https://selfhost.directory/project/astroluma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/astroluma.md)
- [budibase](https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/budibase.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/astroluma-vs-budibase