# AstrBot vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AstrBot | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 124 in AI | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 44 650 ✓ | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 671 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v4.29.3 · 24 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

AstrBot scores 88/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

AstrBot ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, AstrBot is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

AstrBot is growing faster right now (+3 671 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AstrBot](https://selfhost.directory/project/astrbot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/astrbot.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

## Related comparisons

- [AstrBot vs hermes-agent-with-webui](https://selfhost.directory/compare/astrbot-vs-hermes-agent-with-webui)
- [AstrBot vs nanoclaw](https://selfhost.directory/compare/astrbot-vs-nanoclaw)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/astrbot-vs-tube-archivist