AsteriskvsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Asterisk | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in VoIP | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 3 647 | 47 724 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +82 | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 10 |
| Latest release | certified-22.8-cert5 · 19 Oct 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 71/100 for Asterisk, so it is the safer default.
Asterisk ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Text Generation WebUI.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; Asterisk needs more configuration.
Asterisk is growing faster right now (+82 stars in 30 days).
Asterisk details →Text Generation WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep Asterisk, compare it with
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with