# Asterisk vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Asterisk | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in VoIP | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 3 653 | 45 067 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +84 | +1 666 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | certified-22.8-cert5 · 19 Oct 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 71/100 for Asterisk, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for Asterisk.

If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; Asterisk needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 666 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Asterisk](https://selfhost.directory/project/asterisk) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/asterisk.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/asterisk-vs-reactive-resume