# AriaNg vs Text Generation WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AriaNg | Text Generation WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 45 in Download Management | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 13 264 | 47 727 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +62 ✓ | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.3.15 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 69/100 for AriaNg, so it is the safer default.

Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for AriaNg.

AriaNg is growing faster right now (+62 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AriaNg](https://selfhost.directory/project/ariang) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ariang.md)
- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ariang-vs-text-generation-webui