# AriaNg vs SRS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AriaNg | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 45 in Download Management | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 13 264 | 29 391 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +62 | +112 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.3.15 · 5 Oct 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 69/100 for AriaNg, so it is the safer default.

SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for AriaNg.

If you want the quickest setup, AriaNg is easier to run; SRS needs more configuration.

## Details

- [AriaNg](https://selfhost.directory/project/ariang) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ariang.md)
- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ariang-vs-srs