# AriaNg vs sdnext

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AriaNg | sdnext |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 45 in Download Management | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 13 264 ✓ | 7 362 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +62 ✓ | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.3.15 · 5 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sdnext scores 71/100 against 69/100 for AriaNg, so it is the safer default.

AriaNg ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.

If you want the quickest setup, AriaNg is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.

AriaNg is growing faster right now (+62 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AriaNg](https://selfhost.directory/project/ariang) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ariang.md)
- [sdnext](https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ariang-vs-sdnext