# AriaNg vs ruTorrent

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AriaNg | ruTorrent |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 45 in Download Management | #4 of 12 in Bittorrent |
| GitHub stars | 13 263 ✓ | 2 188 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +61 ✓ | +9 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.3.15 · 5 Oct 2026 | v5.3.19 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

AriaNg scores 69/100 against 62/100 for ruTorrent, so it is the safer default.

ruTorrent ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for AriaNg.

If you want the quickest setup, AriaNg is easier to run; ruTorrent needs more configuration.

AriaNg is growing faster right now (+61 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AriaNg](https://selfhost.directory/project/ariang) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ariang.md)
- [ruTorrent](https://selfhost.directory/project/rutorrent) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rutorrent.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ariang-vs-rutorrent