# Argo CD vs torqvoice

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Argo CD | torqvoice |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 28 in CI/CD | #4 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 24 500 ✓ | 45 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +264 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 22 |
| Latest release | v3.3.18 · 22 Oct 2026 | v1.2.64 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Argo CD scores 81/100 against 42/100 for torqvoice, so it is the safer default.

Argo CD ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 22 for torqvoice.

Argo CD is growing faster right now (+264 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Argo CD](https://selfhost.directory/project/argo-cd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/argo-cd.md)
- [torqvoice](https://selfhost.directory/project/torqvoice) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/torqvoice.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/argo-cd-vs-torqvoice