# Argo CD vs rudderstack

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Argo CD | rudderstack |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 28 in CI/CD | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform |
| GitHub stars | 24 498 ✓ | 4 508 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +273 ✓ | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 39 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.3.18 · 22 Oct 2026 | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Argo CD scores 81/100 against 63/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.

rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 30 for Argo CD.

If you want the quickest setup, Argo CD is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.

Argo CD is growing faster right now (+273 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Argo CD](https://selfhost.directory/project/argo-cd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/argo-cd.md)
- [rudderstack](https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/argo-cd-vs-rudderstack