# Argo CD vs R2R

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Argo CD | R2R |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 28 in CI/CD | #6 of 7 in RAG |
| GitHub stars | 24 503 ✓ | 8 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +267 ✓ | +3 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.3.18 · 22 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Argo CD scores 81/100 against 59/100 for R2R, so it is the safer default.

Argo CD ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for R2R.

Argo CD is growing faster right now (+267 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Argo CD](https://selfhost.directory/project/argo-cd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/argo-cd.md)
- [R2R](https://selfhost.directory/project/r2r) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/r2r.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/argo-cd-vs-r2r