# Argo CD vs mitmproxy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Argo CD | mitmproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 28 in CI/CD | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 24 497 | 46 448 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +272 | +1 313 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v3.3.18 · 22 Oct 2026 | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 81/100 for Argo CD, so it is the safer default.

Argo CD ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 313 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Argo CD](https://selfhost.directory/project/argo-cd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/argo-cd.md)
- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/argo-cd-vs-mitmproxy