# Argo CD vs HiClaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Argo CD | HiClaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 28 in CI/CD | #32 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 24 495 ✓ | 5 885 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +270 ✓ | +222 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 15 |
| Latest release | v3.3.18 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Argo CD scores 81/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.

Argo CD ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for HiClaw.

If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; Argo CD needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Argo CD](https://selfhost.directory/project/argo-cd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/argo-cd.md)
- [HiClaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/argo-cd-vs-hiclaw