# Argo CD vs gitbucket

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Argo CD | gitbucket |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 28 in CI/CD | #5 of 14 in Code Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 24 498 ✓ | 9 418 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +273 ✓ | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v3.3.18 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.48.0 · 20 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Scala |

## Which one should you pick?

Argo CD scores 81/100 against 68/100 for gitbucket, so it is the safer default.

Argo CD ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for gitbucket.

If you want the quickest setup, gitbucket is easier to run; Argo CD needs more configuration.

Argo CD is growing faster right now (+273 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Argo CD](https://selfhost.directory/project/argo-cd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/argo-cd.md)
- [gitbucket](https://selfhost.directory/project/gitbucket) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gitbucket.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/argo-cd-vs-gitbucket