# Argo CD vs garm

> Two self-hosted [CI/CD projects](https://selfhost.directory/cicd), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Argo CD | garm |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 28 in CI/CD | #20 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 24 498 ✓ | 428 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +273 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v3.3.18 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.2.1 · 8 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Argo CD scores 81/100 against 51/100 for garm, so it is the safer default.

Argo CD ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for garm.

If you want the quickest setup, Argo CD is easier to run; garm needs more configuration.

Argo CD is growing faster right now (+273 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Argo CD](https://selfhost.directory/project/argo-cd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/argo-cd.md)
- [garm](https://selfhost.directory/project/garm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/garm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/argo-cd-vs-garm