# Argilla vs Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Argilla | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Data Collection | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 5 185 ✓ | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Argilla and Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes score the same (64/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Argilla.

If you want the quickest setup, Argilla is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.

Argilla is growing faster right now (+64 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Argilla](https://selfhost.directory/project/argilla) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/argilla.md)
- [Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/argilla-vs-zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s