ArgillavsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Argilla | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Data Collection | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 5 185 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 |
| Latest release | — | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Argilla scores 64/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Argilla.
Argilla is growing faster right now (+64 stars in 30 days).
Argilla details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep Argilla, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with