ArgillavsUmami
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Argilla | Umami | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Data Collection | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 5 185 | 39 753 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 | +772 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 13 |
| Latest release | — | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Umami scores 85/100 against 64/100 for Argilla, so it is the safer default.
Umami ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Argilla.
If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; Argilla needs more configuration.
Umami is growing faster right now (+772 stars in 30 days).
Argilla details →Umami details →
Swap a project
Keep Argilla, compare it with
Keep Umami, compare it with