# Argilla vs supabase-automated-self-host

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Argilla | supabase-automated-self-host |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Data Collection | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 5 185 ✓ | 506 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +63 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Argilla scores 64/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.

Argilla is growing faster right now (+63 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Argilla](https://selfhost.directory/project/argilla) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/argilla.md)
- [supabase-automated-self-host](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase-automated-self-host) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase-automated-self-host.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/argilla-vs-supabase-automated-self-host