# Argilla vs PanWatch

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Argilla | PanWatch |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Data Collection | #3 of 9 in Fintech |
| GitHub stars | 5 185 ✓ | 2 283 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +63 | +132 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 0.20.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Argilla scores 64/100 against 62/100 for PanWatch, so it is the safer default.

PanWatch ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Argilla.

If you want the quickest setup, PanWatch is easier to run; Argilla needs more configuration.

PanWatch is growing faster right now (+132 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Argilla](https://selfhost.directory/project/argilla) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/argilla.md)
- [PanWatch](https://selfhost.directory/project/panwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/panwatch.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/argilla-vs-panwatch