# AReno vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AReno | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #53 of 125 in AI | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 382 | 92 652 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +57 711 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 49/100 for AReno, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for AReno.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; AReno needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 711 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AReno](https://selfhost.directory/project/areno) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/areno.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/areno-vs-omnivoice-studio