# ArchiveTeam Warrior vs spacedrive

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ArchiveTeam Warrior | spacedrive |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 70/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation | #4 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 461 | 39 336 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +309 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

spacedrive scores 70/100 against 44/100 for ArchiveTeam Warrior, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, ArchiveTeam Warrior is easier to run; spacedrive needs more configuration.

spacedrive is growing faster right now (+309 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ArchiveTeam Warrior](https://selfhost.directory/project/archiveteam-warrior) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/archiveteam-warrior.md)
- [spacedrive](https://selfhost.directory/project/spacedrive) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/spacedrive.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/archiveteam-warrior-vs-spacedrive