# ArchiveTeam Warrior vs LinkWarden

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ArchiveTeam Warrior | LinkWarden |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation | #2 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 461 | 20 261 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +424 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.16.3 · 9 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

LinkWarden scores 79/100 against 44/100 for ArchiveTeam Warrior, so it is the safer default.

LinkWarden ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ArchiveTeam Warrior.

If you want the quickest setup, ArchiveTeam Warrior is easier to run; LinkWarden needs more configuration.

LinkWarden is growing faster right now (+424 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ArchiveTeam Warrior](https://selfhost.directory/project/archiveteam-warrior) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/archiveteam-warrior.md)
- [LinkWarden](https://selfhost.directory/project/linkwarden) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/linkwarden.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Karakeep vs LinkWarden](https://selfhost.directory/compare/karakeep-vs-linkwarden)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/archiveteam-warrior-vs-linkwarden