# ArchiveTeam Warrior vs Karakeep

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ArchiveTeam Warrior | Karakeep |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation | #1 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 461 | 30 135 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +887 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.34.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Karakeep scores 82/100 against 44/100 for ArchiveTeam Warrior, so it is the safer default.

Karakeep ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ArchiveTeam Warrior.

If you want the quickest setup, ArchiveTeam Warrior is easier to run; Karakeep needs more configuration.

Karakeep is growing faster right now (+887 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ArchiveTeam Warrior](https://selfhost.directory/project/archiveteam-warrior) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/archiveteam-warrior.md)
- [Karakeep](https://selfhost.directory/project/karakeep) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/karakeep.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Karakeep vs LinkWarden](https://selfhost.directory/compare/karakeep-vs-linkwarden)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/archiveteam-warrior-vs-karakeep