# ArchivesSpace vs Wallabag

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ArchivesSpace | Wallabag |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation | #4 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 447 | 13 034 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +51 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v4.2.1 · 29 Jun 2026 | 2.6.15 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Wallabag scores 73/100 against 58/100 for ArchivesSpace, so it is the safer default.

ArchivesSpace ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Wallabag.

If you want the quickest setup, Wallabag is easier to run; ArchivesSpace needs more configuration.

Wallabag is growing faster right now (+51 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ArchivesSpace](https://selfhost.directory/project/archivesspace) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/archivesspace.md)
- [Wallabag](https://selfhost.directory/project/wallabag) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wallabag.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/archivesspace-vs-wallabag