ArchivesSpacevsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ArchivesSpace | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 447 | 56 874 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +145 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 5 |
| Latest release | v4.2.1 · 29 Jun 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 58/100 for ArchivesSpace, so it is the safer default.
Typst ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ArchivesSpace.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; ArchivesSpace needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+145 stars in 30 days).
ArchivesSpace details →Typst details →
Swap a project
Keep ArchivesSpace, compare it with
Keep Typst, compare it with