ArchivesSpacevsResume-Matcher
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ArchivesSpace | Resume-Matcher | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation | #1 of 12 in Document Processing |
| GitHub stars | 447 | 28 921 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +407 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 5 |
| Latest release | v4.2.1 · 29 Jun 2026 | v1.4.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Resume-Matcher scores 81/100 against 58/100 for ArchivesSpace, so it is the safer default.
Resume-Matcher ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ArchivesSpace.
If you want the quickest setup, Resume-Matcher is easier to run; ArchivesSpace needs more configuration.
Resume-Matcher is growing faster right now (+407 stars in 30 days).
ArchivesSpace details →Resume-Matcher details →
Swap a project
Keep ArchivesSpace, compare it with
Keep Resume-Matcher, compare it with