# ArchivesSpace vs PaddleOCR

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ArchivesSpace | PaddleOCR |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation | #1 of 4 in OCR |
| GitHub stars | 447 | 91 931 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +490 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.2.1 · 29 Jun 2026 ✓ | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 58/100 for ArchivesSpace, so it is the safer default.

PaddleOCR ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ArchivesSpace.

If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; ArchivesSpace needs more configuration.

PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+490 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ArchivesSpace](https://selfhost.directory/project/archivesspace) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/archivesspace.md)
- [PaddleOCR](https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/archivesspace-vs-paddleocr