# Archivematica vs spacedrive

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Archivematica | spacedrive |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 70/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation | #4 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 522 | 39 334 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +312 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

spacedrive scores 70/100 against 57/100 for Archivematica, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, spacedrive is easier to run; Archivematica needs more configuration.

spacedrive is growing faster right now (+312 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Archivematica](https://selfhost.directory/project/archivematica) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/archivematica.md)
- [spacedrive](https://selfhost.directory/project/spacedrive) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/spacedrive.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/archivematica-vs-spacedrive