# ArchiveBox vs Yarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ArchiveBox | Yarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation | #7 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 28 898 ✓ | 4 080 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +309 ✓ | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v0.9.77 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.9 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

ArchiveBox scores 79/100 against 61/100 for Yarr, so it is the safer default.

ArchiveBox ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Yarr.

ArchiveBox is growing faster right now (+309 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ArchiveBox](https://selfhost.directory/project/archivebox) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/archivebox.md)
- [Yarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/yarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/yarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/archivebox-vs-yarr