# ArchiveBox vs OpenReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ArchiveBox | OpenReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 28 897 ✓ | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +308 ✓ | +34 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.9.77 · 27 Oct 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

ArchiveBox scores 79/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for ArchiveBox.

If you want the quickest setup, ArchiveBox is easier to run; OpenReader needs more configuration.

ArchiveBox is growing faster right now (+308 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ArchiveBox](https://selfhost.directory/project/archivebox) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/archivebox.md)
- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/archivebox-vs-openreader