# ArchiveBox vs omnom

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ArchiveBox | omnom |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation | #26 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 28 894 ✓ | 666 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +314 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.9.77 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.9.0 · 18 Jan 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

ArchiveBox scores 79/100 against 49/100 for omnom, so it is the safer default.

ArchiveBox ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for omnom.

If you want the quickest setup, ArchiveBox is easier to run; omnom needs more configuration.

ArchiveBox is growing faster right now (+314 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ArchiveBox](https://selfhost.directory/project/archivebox) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/archivebox.md)
- [omnom](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnom) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnom.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/archivebox-vs-omnom