# Arcane vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Arcane | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 44 in Container Management | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 8 103 | 12 827 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +534 ✓ | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 31 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.17.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Arcane scores 76/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.

Arcane ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.

If you want the quickest setup, Arcane is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.

Arcane is growing faster right now (+534 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Arcane](https://selfhost.directory/project/arcane) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/arcane.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/arcane-vs-zookeeper