ArcanevsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Arcane | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 44 in Container Management | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 8 101 | 117 750 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +532 | +5 391 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 31 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.17.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 76/100 for Arcane, so it is the safer default.
Arcane ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, Arcane is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 391 stars in 30 days).
Arcane details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep Arcane, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with