# Arcane vs SRS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Arcane | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 44 in Container Management | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 8 102 | 29 390 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +533 ✓ | +113 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 31 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | v2.17.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Go | C |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 76/100 for Arcane, so it is the safer default.

Arcane ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for SRS.

If you want the quickest setup, Arcane is easier to run; SRS needs more configuration.

Arcane is growing faster right now (+533 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Arcane](https://selfhost.directory/project/arcane) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/arcane.md)
- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/arcane-vs-srs