ArcanevsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Arcane | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 44 in Container Management | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 8 101 | 35 793 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +532 | +868 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 31 | 28 |
| Latest release | v2.17.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 76/100 for Arcane, so it is the safer default.
Arcane ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 28 for SeaweedFS.
If you want the quickest setup, Arcane is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.
Arcane details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep Arcane, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with