ArcanevsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Arcane | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 44 in Container Management | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 8 103 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +510 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 31 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.17.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Arcane scores 76/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
Arcane ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
If you want the quickest setup, Arcane is easier to run; Scada-LTS needs more configuration.
Arcane is growing faster right now (+510 stars in 30 days).
Arcane details →Scada-LTS details →
Swap a project
Keep Arcane, compare it with
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with