ArcanevsReadMeABook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Arcane | ReadMeABook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 44 in Container Management | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 8 101 | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +532 | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 31 | 21 |
| Latest release | v2.17.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Arcane scores 76/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.
Arcane ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for ReadMeABook.
If you want the quickest setup, Arcane is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
Arcane is growing faster right now (+532 stars in 30 days).
Arcane details →ReadMeABook details →
Swap a project
Keep Arcane, compare it with
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with