ArcanevsMastodon
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Arcane | Mastodon | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 44 in Container Management | #2 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 8 105 | 50 457 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +512 | +137 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 31 | 38 |
| Latest release | v2.17.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | v4.4.26 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Mastodon scores 82/100 against 76/100 for Arcane, so it is the safer default.
Mastodon ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 31 for Arcane.
If you want the quickest setup, Arcane is easier to run; Mastodon needs more configuration.
Arcane is growing faster right now (+512 stars in 30 days).
Arcane details →Mastodon details →
Swap a project
Keep Arcane, compare it with
Keep Mastodon, compare it with